A North African Christian lawyer's case, chapter by chapter, for why believers must boycott the circus, theater, stadium, and amphitheater, traced to idolatry at the root of every show.
De Spectaculis ("On the Shows") is Tertullian's treatise arguing that Christians must not attend the public entertainments of the Roman world: chariot races in the circus, stage plays in the theater, athletic contests in the stadium, and gladiatorial and beast fights in the amphitheater. He opens by addressing catechumens preparing for baptism and believers who might excuse attendance as harmless pleasure, then answers pagan objections that everything used in the shows -- horses, voices, stone, timber -- is God's own creation and therefore cannot be forbidden. Tertullian counters that created things can be perverted from their maker's purpose, and spends the bulk of the work proving that every show, traced through its origin, its title, its trappings, its venue, and its patron arts, turns out to be dedicated to a pagan god or to the spirits of the dead -- making attendance a violation of the baptismal renunciation of "the devil, his pomp, and his angels."
The argument unfolds as a systematic audit. Chapters 5-12 work through each spectacle in turn: the circus games traced to Etruscan and Roman religious founders and to the Sun, Neptune, Consus, and Murcia; the theater identified as literally a shrine of Venus (with Pompey's own dedication speech quoted as proof); the athletic contests tied to Olympian, Nemean, and Isthmian gods; the gladiatorial "munus" shown to have begun as human sacrifice at funerals, later dressed up as entertainment. Having closed the idolatry case, Tertullian broadens to other grounds -- the spectacles stir up rage, partisanship, and grief that violate the calm the Holy Spirit requires (16), the theater is a school of unchastity (17), the stadium abuses the God-given human body (18), the amphitheater trades in human blood under the flimsy justification that only the guilty suffer (19). He then rebuts specific excuses people offered him -- that the sun looks down on filth without being defiled, that nothing in Scripture names the shows by name -- and closes (28-30) by redirecting Christian appetite for spectacle toward the truly satisfying show still to come: the return of Christ and the last judgment, imagined chapter by chapter as a spectacle that will outdo every circus, stage, and arena Rome ever built.
Written around 197-202 CE, De Spectaculis is a primary witness to how an educated Latin Christian saw the entertainment infrastructure of the Roman city as inseparable from its religion -- every racetrack, stage, and altar folded into a single system of civic cult that a convert was expected to renounce in full at baptism. It is also one of the sharpest surviving descriptions of Roman public entertainment from someone who plainly knew it well: the circus's shrines and colors, Pompey's theater dedication, the training and killing of gladiators, and the social contempt heaped on the same performers the crowds idolized. The closing vision of the last judgment as a cosmic spectacle -- naming Rhadamanthus, philosophers, poets, and persecutors burning while Tertullian watches -- became one of the most quoted (and, later, most criticized by writers uneasy with its vindictiveness) passages in the history of Christian rhetoric.
“we declare with our own mouth that we have renounced the devil, together with his pomp and his angelic host.”
— De Spectaculis – Chapter 4
“Places do not defile us in themselves; it is what is done in those places that defiles”
— De Spectaculis – Chapter 8
“The theater, properly speaking, is a shrine of Venus.”
— De Spectaculis – Chapter 10
“we ourselves win the crown. Do you want some blood as well? You have the blood of Christ.”
— De Spectaculis – Chapter 29
“I believe they are more delightful than the circus and both tiers of the theater and every stadium put together.”
— De Spectaculis – Chapter 30
It is Tertullian's treatise arguing that Christians must not attend the Roman public entertainments -- chariot races, stage plays, athletic games, and gladiatorial shows -- because every one of them, traced back through its origin, name, trappings, and venue, turns out to be dedicated to a pagan god or the cult of the dead. Attending, he argues, breaks the renunciation of idols and demons that converts make at baptism.
He walks through its founding legends (Etruscan religious games, Romulus dedicating races to Consus and Mars), its shrines built into the arena itself (a temple to the Sun at its center, altars to Neptune, Cybele, and Murcia), and even its racing colors, which later generations dedicated to the seasons and elements. He concludes every ornament of the circus is "a separate temple."
No. He explicitly says a Christian may enter a temple or spectacle venue for an unrelated, necessary reason without sin, because "places do not defile us in themselves; it is what is done in those places that defiles." What is forbidden is participating in or witnessing the idolatrous or immoral business the place exists for.
He identifies the theater as literally consecrated to Venus, citing Pompey the Great's own dedication speech calling his theater a temple of Venus with seating beneath it. Beyond the idolatry charge, he argues the stage is "the private meeting-hall of unchastity," citing its mimes, cross-dressed roles, and public display of prostitutes.
He argues Scripture speaks in general terms that cover the specific case -- the Psalm verse about not sitting "in the seat of the scornful" applies to any assembly of the ungodly, not just the council that condemned Jesus. He also argues that spectacles fall under the broader biblical condemnation of "the desires of the world," since a lust for pleasure is one species of the lusts Scripture already forbids.
He traces the "munus" (duty-offering) to its origin as human sacrifice at funerals -- captives once bought and killed at tombs to appease the dead -- later dressed up as entertainment once the honor shifted from the dead to the living. He also notes the double standard by which Roman law honored star gladiators and performers with fame while officially stripping them of civic rights.
In chapters 28-30 he redirects the appetite for spectacle toward specifically Christian pleasures -- reconciliation with God, an untroubled conscience, martyrdom's "crown" -- and climaxes with a vision of Christ's return and the last judgment as a far grander spectacle than any circus or theater, in which persecutors, philosophers, and poets are seen suffering while the faithful watch.
It dates to roughly 197-202 CE, from Tertullian's time in Carthage. It is a key primary source for how thoroughly Roman public entertainment was interwoven with civic religion, and it preserves details -- Pompey's theater dedication, the shrines built into the circus, the treatment of gladiators and actors -- not always found elsewhere.
Ad Martyras · Ad Nationes 1 · Ad Nationes 2 · Adversus Marcionem 1 · Adversus Marcionem 2 · Adversus Marcionem 3 · Adversus Marcionem 4 · Adversus Marcionem 5 · Adversus Praxean · Apologeticum · De Anima · De Baptismo